We will prepare all students to graduate ready for enrollment, enlistment, or employment.
Area Key Performance Indicators
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Graduation On Track Status
|
- Office Discipline Referrals
|
|
|
|
|
Priority One: We will prepare all students to graduate ready for enrollment, enlistment, or employment.
Objective/Strategy One: Establish frameworks/systems to ensure rigorous and engaging instruction in every classroom for every student.
|
Performance Indicator
|
Measurement Tool(s)
|
Baseline
|
Annual Goal
|
|
% of students (Grades 1-10) demonstrating academic growth in ELA
|
FAST & STAR State Assessments
|
ELA Scaled Score growth from End of Year (EOY) Assessment to EOY Assessment 2022/23 & 2023/24 (source: FOCUS)
% of students demonstrating academic growth through an increase in ELA scaled score from 22/23 FAST/STAR EOY to FAST/STAR 23/24 EOY
|
Baseline + 1% = Annual Goal
Example: 61%
61%+1% = 62%
Example: 62%
|
|
% of students (Grades 1-Algebra/Geometry) demonstrating academic growth in Math
|
FAST & STAR State Assessments
|
Math Scaled Score growth from EOY Assessment to EOY Assessment 2022/23 & 2023/24 (source: FOCUS)
% of students demonstrating academic growth through an increase in Math scaled score rom 22/23 FAST/STAR EOY to FAST/STAR 23/24 EOY: Example 61%
|
Baseline + 1% = Annual Goal
Example: 61%
61%+1% = 62%
Example: 62%
|
|
% of ESE students (Grades 1-10) demonstrating academic growth in ELA
|
FAST & STAR State Assessments
|
ELA Scaled Score growth from EOY Assessment to EOY Assessment 2022/23 & 2023/24 (source: FOCUS)
% of ESE students demonstrating academic growth through an increase in ELA scaled score from 22/23 FAST EOY to FAST 23/24 EOY
|
Baseline + 1% = Annual Goal
Example: 61%
61%+1% = 62%
Example: 62%
|
|
% of ESE students (Grades 1-Algebra/Geometry) demonstrating academic growth in Math
|
FAST & STAR State Assessments
|
Math Scaled Score growth from EOY Assessment to EOY Assessment 2022/23 & 2023/24 (source: FOCUS)
% of ESE students demonstrating academic growth through an increase in Math scaled score from 22/23 FAST/STAR EOY to FAST/STAR 23/24 EOY
|
Baseline + 1% = Annual Goal
Example: 61%
61%+1% = 62%
Example: 62%
|
|
% of L25 students demonstrating academic growth in ELA
|
FAST Assessments
|
ELA Standard Score Growth from End of Year (EOY) Assessment to End of Year (EOY) Assessment 2022/23 & 2023/24
(Obtained through FOCUS)
% of L25 students demonstrating academic growth through an increase in their ELA standard score from 22/23 FAST EOY to FAST 23/24 EOY
Example 61%
|
Baseline + 1% = Annual Goal
Example: 61%
61%+1% = 62%
Example: 62%
|
|
% of L25 students demonstrating academic growth in Math
|
FAST Assessments
|
Math Standard Score Growth from End of Year (EOY) Assessment to End of Year (EOY) Assessment 2022/23 & 2023/24
(Obtained through FOCUS)
% of L25 students demonstrating academic growth through an increase in their Math standard score from 22/23 FAST EOY to FAST 23/24 EOY
Example 61%
|
Baseline + 1% = Annual Goal
Example: 61%
61%+1% = 62%
Example: 62%
|
|
% of students (Grades K-10) achieving at or above proficiency on state assessments in ELA
|
FAST & STAR State Assessments
|
ELA academic proficiency at a level 3 or better on FAST/STAR 2023/24 EOY
State Average % of students grades K-10 demonstrating proficiency at a level 3 or better on FAST/STAR ELA 23/24 EOY.
|
State Average FAST/STAR ELA 23/24 SY + 1% = Annual Goal
Example: 61%
61%+1% = 62%
Example: 62%
|
|
% of students (Grades K-Algebra/Geometry) achieving at or above proficiency on state assessments in Math
|
FAST & STAR State Assessments
|
Math academic proficiency at a level 3 or better on FAST/STAR 2023/24 EOY
State Average % of students grades K-Algebra/Geometry demonstrating proficiency at a level 3 or better on FAST/STAR Math 23/24 EOY.
|
State Average FAST/STAR Math 23/24 SY + 1% = Annual Goal
Example: 61%
61%+1% = 62%
Example: 62%
|
Objective/Strategy Two: Provide multiple pathways for students to become college and/or career ready.
|
Performance Indicator
|
Measurement Tool(s)
|
Baseline
|
Annual Goal
|
|
Creation of the Profile of a Graduate
|
Xello Portfolio Tool
|
Percentage of 12th-grade high school students who have completed a career portfolio in Xello at the end of the 2024-2025 school year.
Percentage of high school students at the end of the 2024-2025 school year who have completed a portfolio in Xello
|
Percentage of high school students at the end of the 2024-2025 school year who have completed a portfolio in Xello
Example: 50% +10% = 60%
|
|
Creation of the Profile of a Graduate
|
On Track Graduation Formula
|
Percentage of students on track for graduation at the beginning of the 2024-2025 school year
Percentage of high school students at the start of the 2024-2025 school year who are on track to graduate
|
Increase the percentage of high school students on track to graduate based on the On Track Graduation Formula to 95%
Example: 88% + 1% = 89%
|
|
Creation of the Profile of a Graduate
|
Graduation Rate
|
Percentage of high school students who graduate as measured by the Florida Department of Education’s graduation rate formula for the 2024-2025 school year.
Percentage of high school seniors who grade as measured by the Florida Department of Education’s formula for graduation rate for the 2024-2025 school year.
|
Increase the percentage of high school seniors who graduate based on the Florida DOE’s formula for graduation to 95%.
Example: 88% + 2%= 90%
|
|
Creation of the Profile of a Graduate
|
Percentage of Students 3E Ready
|
Percentage of high school 12th-grade students who complete their 3E checklist for the 2024-2025 school year.
Percentage of high school students who complete their 3E checklists for the 2024-2025 school year.
|
Increase the percentage of high school seniors who complete their 3E checklists to 95%.
Example: 45% + 10% = 55%
|
|
Number of pathways developed per year
|
Progress related to pathways
|
Number of new Career and Technical Education programs available to secondary and postsecondary programs in Charlotte County.
Number of new Career and Technical Education programs created for the 2024-2025 school year.
|
Increase the number of new Career and Technical Education secondary and postsecondary programs to 5.
Example: 1 new CTE program + 1 new CTE program = 2 new CTE programs.
|
Objective/Strategy Three: Develop and utilize a district-wide, data protocol to drive instruction
|
Revised PI
|
Measurement Tool(s)
|
Baseline
|
Annual Goal
|
|
Development and implementation of a district-wide data protocol
|
Data Protocol Practice Profile & Direct Survey Data (Rubric status of: initial, partial, full implementation)
|
Data Protocol Practice Profile & Direct Survey Data
EOY 2023/24
% of District, School Administrators, and Staff currently meeting full implementation at the end of the 23/24 SY
District = 0%,Admin = 0%
Staff = 0%
|
Increase the % of District Staff and School Admin staff using the Data Protocol at Full Implementation to 25% as evidenced by Direct Survey Data.
District = 25%
Admin = 25%
Staff = 0%
|
Notes: Progression of goal is as follows: 24/25 SY (D = 25%, A = 25%, S = 0%), 25/26 SY (D = 50%, A = 50%, S = 25%), 26/27 SY (D = 75%, A = 75%, S = 50%), 27/28 SY (D = 100%, A = 100%, S = 75%), 28/29 SY (D = 100%, A = 100%, S = 100%)
Objective/Strategy Four: All schools will implement, with fidelity, a school-wide PBIS system within their current MTSS framework.
|
Performance Indicator
|
Measurement Tool(s)
|
Baseline
|
Annual Goal
|
|
Reduction in campus disruptions as measured by a reduction in the number of students receiving one or more office discipline referrals.
|
Office Discipline Referrals (ODR)
|
Total # of students out of every 100 with 1 or more ODRs accumulated during the 2023/24 SY.
Total # of students out of every 100 with 1 or more ODRs accumulated during the 2023/24 SY.
|
total# of students out of 100 with 1 or more ODR(s) - 2% from the 23/24 SY to the 24/25 SY
Example: 30 / 100 students
Example: 30/100 - 2% = Annual Goal
|
|
Reduction in the % of students receiving an office discipline referral that results in out-of-school suspension will reduce by 1% by the end of each school year.
|
Office Discipline Referrals (ODR) and out-of-school suspension data
|
Office Discipline Referrals (ODR) resulting in out-of-school suspension for the 2023/24 EOY
% of Office Discipline Referrals (ODR) resulting in out-of-school suspension for the 2023/24 EOY
|
% of Office Discipline referrals resulting in out-of-school suspension will reduce by 1% from 2023/24 EOY to 2024/25 EOY
Example: 15% - 1% = 14%
|
|
Reduction in the total # of office discipline referrals for drug, alcohol, or tobacco infractions will decrease by 1%
|
Office Discipline Referrals (ODR) for drug, alcohol, or tobacco infractions
|
ODRs accumulated for drug, alcohol, or tobacco infractions during the 23/24 SY.
Total # of ODRs accumulated for drug, alcohol, or tobacco infractions during the 23/24 SY.
|
# of ODRs for drug, alcohol, or tobacco infractions will reduce by 1% from the 23/24 SY to the end of the 24/25 SY
Example: 15% - 1% = 14%
|
|
Increase the number of schools with PBIS model school certification.
|
PBIS DSP Team LOG
|
Total # of schools that have received PBIS model school certification during the 23/24 SY.
1
|
Baseline + 1 = Annual Goal
2
|
|
Increase in school attendance through a reduction of chronically absent students.
|
Chronic Absence Levels
(obtained through EDIS)
|
Students absent 10% or more during the 23/24 SY
% of students absent for 10% or more during the 23/24 SY
|
Baseline - 1% = Annual Goal
Example: 15% - 1% = 14%
|
Objective/Strategy Five: The district will provide high quality evidence-based resiliency and mental health support/services through a multi-tiered system of support (MTSS).
|
Performance Indicator
|
Measurement Tool(s)
|
Baseline
|
Goal Formula
|
|
(Secondary)
Increase the % of students aware of SBMH services at their school
|
District Climate Survey (Student Report)
|
Secondary Students aware of SBMH services at their school, based on a positive score on the climate survey during the 24/25 SY
% of secondary students aware of SBMH services at their school, based on a positive response on the climate survey during the 24/25 SY
|
% of secondary students indicating a positive response (i.e. agree or strongly agree) on the 2024/25 Climate
Survey will increase by 2% on the 2025/26 Climate Survey
Baseline + 2% = Annual Goal
Example: 75% + 2% = 77%
|
|
(Secondary)
Increase the % of students who are satisfied with the mental health services provided at their school
|
District Climate Survey (Student Report)
|
Secondary students satisfied with mental health services at their school, based on a positive score on the climate survey during the 2024/25 SY
% of secondary students satisfied with mental health services at their school, based on a positive response on the climate survey during the 2024/25 SY
|
% of secondary students indicating a positive response (i.e. agree or strongly agree) on the 2024/25 Climate Survey will increase by 1% on the 2025/26 Climate Survey
Baseline + 1% = Annual Goal
Example: 75% + 1% = 76%
|
|
(Elementary)
Increase the % of students who feel adults at their school care about them
|
District Climate Survey (Student Report)
|
Elementary students who feel like adults at their school care about them during the 2024/25 SY
% of elementary students who feel like adults at their school care about them, based on a positive response on the climate survey during the 2024/25 SY
|
% of secondary students indicating a positive response (i.e. agree or strongly agree) on the 2024/25 Climate Survey will increase by 2% on the 2025/26 Climate Survey
Baseline + 2% = Annual Goal
Example: 75% + 2% = 77%
|
|
(Elementary)
Increase the % of students aware of who they can go to if they have a problem
|
District Climate Survey (Student Report)
|
Elementary students aware of who they can go to if they have a problem during the 2024/25 SY
87%
Based on the 2023/24 Climate Survey
|
87% + 1% = 88% (Annual Goal)
88%
|
|
Increase student resiliency skills
|
Navigate Suite 360 Lesson Post-test scores
|
Standards-based resiliency lessons passed by students with an 80% or better
58%
|
58% (Baseline) + 2% = 60%
60%
|
We will provide our staff with the tools and resources needed to promote student success.
Overall Key Performance Indicators “Level 2”
- Teachers Participating in Professional Learning
|
- Teachers Satisfaction regarding Professional Learning
|
- Time Allocated to Professional Learning
|
- Professional Learning Opportunities Aligned with DSP
|
|
|
|
|
- Vacancies first day of school
|
Priority Two: We will provide our staff with the tools and resources needed to promote student success.
Objective/Strategy One: Provide targeted and personalized professional learning for all staff.
|
Performance Indicator
|
Measurement Tool(s)
|
Baseline (Where/When)
Baseline #
|
Goal Formula
Annual Goal
|
|
% of teachers/staff members participating in school-based professional learning (PL) related to SIP goal setting at the beginning of the year
|
Sign in sheets/online participation tracking of the school-based PL plan submitted by the principal as part of SIP development
|
2024-25 baseline year
TBD
|
TBD
|
|
% of participants reporting PL was meaningful and related to overall goals of district
|
Survey revised by DSP Priority 2 subcommittee
|
2024-25 baseline year
TBD
|
TBD
|
Objective/Strategy Two: The district will create/find additional opportunities for professional learning training that aligns to the other priority areas.
|
Performance Indicator
|
Measurement Tool(s)
|
Baseline
|
Annual Goal
|
|
Number of days/hours devoted to district-based PL related to Priority 1 throughout the school year
|
Total hours dedicated to district-based PL offerings associated with Priority 1
|
2024-25 baseline year
TBD
|
TBD
|
|
Record of district-based PL topics/sessions related to Priority 1 throughout the school year
|
List of district-based PL offerings associated with Priority 1
|
2024-25 baseline year
TBD
|
TBD
|
Objective/Strategy Three: The district will effectively recruit and retain staff.
|
Performance Indicator
|
Measurement Tool(s)
|
Baseline
|
Annual Goal
|
|
% of staff retained each year.
|
Percentage of staff returning at the beginning of the school year
|
Staff retained 2023-2024
83% staff retained
|
1% increase per year
|
|
% of leadership celebrating 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 years of service with the district.
|
Percentage of staff celebrating 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 years of service with the district
|
2023-2024
5+ = 17%
10+ = 7%
15+ = 9%
20+ = 6%
25+ = 5%
30+ = 3%
35+ = .5%
|
1% increase overall
|
|
Average length of time in leadership positions
|
|
2023-24
7.4 years in
leadership positions.
|
1% increase in five years
|
|
Number of vacancies that remain on the first day of school
|
|
2023-2024
111 openings
|
2% reduction in openings
|
From Priority Four: We will purposefully allocate resources that maximize success for all.
Objective/Strategy Four: The district will work to improve recruitment and retention of CCPS employees.
Performance Indicators (PI) “Level 3” Note: Transferred from Priority Area 4: Resources
|
Performance Indicator
|
Measurement Tool(s)
|
Baseline
|
Annual Goal
|
|
% of employees returning at the beginning of the school year.
|
HR reporting Survey Data
|
2023-24
83%
|
1% increase per year
|
|
# of employees promoted to administrative positions
|
HR reporting Survey Data
|
2023-24
8
|
TBD
|
We will engage every group in our community through transparent comunication and a variety of feedback methods.
Overall Key Performance Indicators “Level 2”
- Use of Communication Plan
|
- Number of Engaged Parents (percentage)
|
|
Social Media ( Facebook /Instagram) analytics (reach and followers)
|
Priority Three: We will engage every group in our community through transparent communication and a variety of feedback methods.
Objective/Strategy One: The district will create and utilize a consistent communication and engagement plan.
Performance Indicators (PI) “Level 3”
|
Performance Indicator
|
Measurement Tool(s)
|
Baseline
|
Annual Goal
|
|
The creation of a district communication and engagement plan.
|
Production of the district communication and engagement plan
|
Plan status by August 2024
% completed
|
100% by January 2025
|
|
Creation of a school communication and engagement plan framework
|
Production of the district communication and engagement plan framework
|
Framework by August 2024
% completed
|
100% by January 2025
|
|
Schools trained on schools communication and engagement plan framework
|
% of schools trained
|
Trainings by January 2025
%
|
100% by May 2025
|
|
Submission and review of completed school communications and engagement plan
|
Framework standards
|
Plan reviews by June 2025
%
|
100% by Aug 2025
|
Objective/Strategy Two: We will promote and enhance our engagement of the community at the school and district level.
|
Performance Indicator
|
Measurement Tool(s)
|
Baseline
|
Annual Goal
|
|
Social Media engagement ( Facebook /Instagram)
|
Social media analytics (reach and followers)
|
Jan-June 2024
July-December 2024
Reach
Follow
|
The increase from the previous biannual audit
|
|
Positive feedback regarding community engagement events
|
School and district satisfaction Survey
|
Summer 2025 Survey
|
|
|
% of parents utilizing SIS Parent Portal
|
Focus Report
|
Mary 2024 data
% of parents
|
Meet minimum target of 95% by EOY
|
We will purposefully allocate resources that maximize success for all.
Overall Key Performance Indicators “Level 2”
- Percentage of School Facilities Considered Up to Date
|
- Percentage of Classrooms Considered Up to Date
|
- Per pupil Allocation for General, Federal, and Combined budgets
|
- Student to Teacher Ratios
|
Priority Four: We will purposefully allocate resources that maximize success for all.
Objective/Strategy One: Systematically analyze and review facilities to support services for improved district outcomes.
|
Revised PI
|
Measurement Tool(s)
|
Baseline
|
Annual Goal
|
|
Creation of standards for educational environments
|
Classroom Rubric
|
Calendar Year 2024
% of Classroom “meeting” standards
|
|
|
Progress toward long range facilities plan to provide for students and staff
|
Outside Facility Rubric
|
Calendar Year 2024
% of Schools “meeting” standards
|
|
Objective/Strategy Two: Create a funding model that considers both student enrollment and the unique school needs represented in the district strategic plan and School Improvement Plan.
|
Revised PI
|
Measurement Tool(s)
|
Baseline
|
Annual Goal
|
|
Expenditures spent on instructional needs
|
Per pupil expenditure report for General, Federal, and Combined
|
B+
SY2023/24
TBD
|
Annual review and alignment
|
|
Student to teacher ratio for average academic classroom size
|
Class Size Report
|
Focus
SY2023/24
TBD
|
Annual review and alignment
|
|
Expenditures spent on ESSA tiered subgroups (ELL and SWD)
|
Per pupil expenditure report for ELL and SWD
|
B+
SY2023/24
TBD
|
Annual review and alignment
|
Additional settings for Safari Browser.
